cassad_eng (cassad_eng) wrote,

Bulat Now Is Not The Same It Used To Be

At some point on various political and near-military forums that heated discussion on the topic of Ukrainscious (i.e., Ukraine-conscious) cries of "Bulat – the best tank on the territory of the CIS" (in Russan) (or even the world in the most wacko cases) with obligatory comparisons with the T-90 modifications.
Lately the "Bulats" started to be used in the punitive operation in Donbass.
The tanks of the 1-st separate tank brigade of the 8-th army corpus of Ukraine were redeployed Into the zone of the standoff between the Ukrainian fascists and the militia. This detachment, primarily, is armed with the best modification of the T-64 tank: this is BM "Bulat".
Ukrainian experts proclaimed that, due to the availability of the dynamic defense of the type "Knife" this tank "is effectively invulnerable for the modern anti-tank weapons", both in forehead projection, and from the sides.
The Russian experts noted, that the Ukrainian constructors failed to provide effective anti-mine robustness of the chassis of the tank, the bottom.
Moreover, there are problems with the protection of the so-called "lower forehead detail", which is a problem not only for the tanks of "T" series, but also for the majority of the machines in the world armies. – link (in Russian)

PS. Practice showed that the tank is a tank, it is nothing nothing super-complicated from the point of view of destruction, the militia already burned at least 1.
Meanwhile the junta is trying to (in Russian) present the destroyed tank as a "success of its aviation".

 Original article: (in Russian)

Tags: luhansk, tanks, war in ukraine

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.